A wave of criticism is mounting against a segment of Ghana’s media and professional personalities, accusing them of being political opportunists who leverage government connections for personal gain while neglecting grassroots party loyalists.
In a strongly worded social media commentary that has sparked widespread debate, a writer using the pseudonym “Sir Obama Pokuase” has alleged that certain public figures, often celebrated with titles like “Women of Valor,” lack substantial contributions to national development and instead thrive on relationships with the political elite.
The commentary questions the authenticity of their influence and the sources of their wealth. “These so-called influencers carry little to zero positive influence,” the post read. It challenged the public to consider whether the luxurious lifestyles—including expensive cars and plush homes—often displayed by some media personalities could be sustained by journalism salaries and allowances alone.
The critique specifically targets individuals who were closely associated with appointees of the previous administration. The writer claims these figures moved from office to office collecting financial favors (“big fat envelopes”) at the expense of dedicated party footsoldiers who had worked for years without such access.
The narrative takes a sharper turn by alleging a strategic realignment ahead of the 2024 elections. According to the post, as the political tide began to turn against the then-government, these same individuals “jumped ship” to align with the incoming political powers. They are now accused of launching verbal attacks against their former allies in a bid to curry favor with the new administration.
The commentary draws a contrast between these alleged opportunists and respected professionals like Prof. Audrey Gadzekpo and Prof. Elsie Kaufmann, noting that such accomplished individuals do not flaunt their status or connections despite their significant achievements.
The author concluded by urging supporters of the National Democratic Congress (NDC)—the party now forming the government—to actively target these figures. “NDC footsoldiers have every reason to go after them,” the post stated, advocating for efforts to “spoil their market”—a local parlance meaning to undermine their influence and access.
The remarks have ignited discussions on social media and among political circles about the ethics of media-political relations, the definition of “influence,” and the treatment of party loyalists versus perceived fair-weather allies during a change in government.
